← Back

Did David Hume Disprove the Law of Cause and Effect?

Summary

The sermon explores David Hume's critique of causality, arguing that he questioned our ability to perceive specific causes rather than denying causality itself. While we may not know the exact cause of an event, such as rain making grass wet, the existence of an effect necessitates an antecedent cause. This principle is crucial for understanding theological arguments, as even if we don't perceive creation, its existence as an effect implies a creator.

View original episode ↗