Christ: The Scholar (John 7:14–31) — A Sermon by R.C. Sproul
Read full transcript 21 segments
-
SPROUL: This morning we will be reading again from the gospel according to St. John, from the seventh chapter, beginning at verse fourteen, reading through verse thirty. Hear then the Word of God. “Now about the middle of the Feast Jesus went up into the Temple and taught, and the Jews marveled, saying, ‘How does this man know letters, having never studied?’ And Jesus answered them and said, ‘My doctrine is not mine but His who sent me. And if anyone wills to do His will, he shall know concerning the doctrine whether it is from God or whether I speak on my own authority. He who speaks from himself seeks his own glory, but He who seeks the glory of the one who sent Him is true and no unrighteousness is in Him. Did not Moses give you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. Why do you seek to kill me?’ “The people answered and said, ‘You have a demon. Who is seeking to kill you?’ Jesus answered and said to them, ‘I did one work, and you all marveled. Moses,
-
therefore gave you circumcision – not that it is from Moses, but from the Father – and you circumcise a man on the Sabbath. If a man receives circumcision on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses shall not be broken, are you angry with me because I made a man completely well on the Sabbath? Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.’ “Now some of them from Jerusalem said, ‘Isn’t that He, whom they seek to kill? But look! He speaks boldly, and they say nothing to Him. Do the rulers know, indeed, that this is truly the Christ? However, we know where this man is from; but when the Christ comes, no one knows where He is from.’ And then Jesus cried out as He taught in the Temple saying, ‘You both know me and you know where I am from; and I have not come of myself, but He who sent me is true, whom you do not know. But I know Him, for I am from Him, and He sent me.’ Therefore they sought to take Him, but no one laid a hand on Him because His hour had not yet come. And many of the people believed in Him and said, ‘When the Christ comes, will He do more signs than these, which this man had done?’” He who has ears to hear the Word of God, let them hear. You may be seated. Let us pray. “Now,
-
O Lord, as we continue our study of this gospel, which in its riches, reveals to us so much of the person and work of your dear Son. We pray that every Sabbath day that we hear the reading of this gospel, our understanding of Him will increase and our love for Him may be magnified. For we ask these things in Jesus’ name, amen. When I was a child going to elementary school, my favorite grade was the third grade. A lot of that had to do with Mrs. Macaraw because she was the most fantastic teacher I had in those days; but third grade was fun. But there was this little cloud of fear that hung over us when we were in third grade, when we would hear the testimony from the fourth graders because they would say to us, “Just wait until fourth grade. In fourth grade school really gets hard because in fourth grade you’re going to have to learn to study geography and history and much more difficult multiplication tables.” So I remember trembling as I entered into the fourth grade, but somehow, through the grace of God, made it through the fourth grade, fifth grade, sixth grade,
-
seventh grade, eighth grade, ninth grade, and then we heard, in fear and trembling, of that huge leap in difficulty, in moving from junior high school to senior high school, where the homework assignments would be so much more plenteous and that we’d have to study arcane science such as physics and chemistry and things of that sort. And again, through the grace of God – and I can bear witness this morning, only through the grace of God – I made it through high school and actually got into college. And when we had our first convocation – chapel – at our college the president stood up, and he said, “Look at the person to your right, and now look to the person on your left. One of these two people will not be here next semester.” That was in the days when it was customary for colleges to flunk out fifty percent of their freshmen class; and fortunately I was converted that semester and made an “A” in Bible, which kept me from flunking out.
-
But each one of these different experiences in school came with greater fear about the level or plateau of difficulty that they involved. And then I remember, of course, after college going to seminary and making another adjustment. But probably the biggest adjustment academically in my life was when I enrolled in doctoral studies in the Netherlands. I had no idea how rigorous the academic discipline at that level would be, and I believe only people who have been through that rigorous experience know what it is I’m talking about. But as I finished that, I also realized that there were many of us who had been educated well beyond our intelligence. That is a problem with upper levels of education – that once we go through it we have a tendency to think that we actually know far more than we do, and we have a tendency to tilt the nose a bit and look down at those who have not gone through such rigorous training. And we wonder where people’s degrees are from and whether their credentials are really credible.
-
Well we’re not unusual in that regard because no man’s credentials were ever more seriously challenged by the established academic community than were the credentials of Jesus of Nazareth. We read in the text this morning about this response from the people as He was teaching during the Feast of the Tabernacles: “And the people marveled, saying, ‘How does this man know letters, having never studied?’” And again, the Pharisees and the scribes, the doctors of the law, who had studied under Gamaliel or in the school of Hilael or of other rabbinic traditions, looked askance at Jesus asking for where His sheepskin could be found. “Who did you study under, Mr. Jesus? How many credit hours in theology do you have? As far as we know, you don’t even have a baccalaureate degree, and you do you, then, come into the Temple and have the audacity to presume to teach us?” This was the question brought to Jesus.
-
This was the same Jesus, who when He was a boy, was a child prodigy who absolutely amazed the scholars in the Temple, when He was only twelve years old, at His depth of understanding of the things of theology. So the question is, where did He get His education? Well He answers that question for us. He said, “My doctrine is not mine” – that is, it’s not of my invention, not of my origin. “But my doctrine is His who sent me, and if anyone wants to do His will, He shall know concerning the doctrine whether it is from God, or whether I speak from my own authority. He who speaks from himself seeks his own glory, but He who seeks the glory of the one who sent Him is true, and there is no unrighteousness in Him.” Now I think there’s a lot of confusion about this because if we were to have a pop quiz this morning and I asked you, “Where did Jesus get all this knowledge that He was displaying?” I suspect that many of you would give the answer that’s prevalent out there. “Well He’s God!” And if He’s God, then He must have all knowledge, He must be omniscient,
-
and certainly one who is omniscient has no need to go to school or study under anybody else because He is the source and fountain of all truth. Well let me ask another question. Did the Jesus who was lying in the manger during the nativity know that the world was round? What do you think? Frankly, if somebody asked me that question – did Jesus know that the world was round when He was a baby in the manger – of course I’d want to make some distinctions, but I would say basically the answer would be no. Of course not – at least touching His human nature. The human Jesus had to grow in His knowledge and understanding of the things of God. The human nature of Jesus did not come equipped with the divine attribute of omniscience, and when we think that the human nature of Christ possessed these divine characters, we slip into a very serious and ancient heresy by which the divine nature swallows
-
up the human nature, and we fail to recognize the limits of Jesus’ knowledge. Now this has been a very controversial matter historically. You think, for example, when the disciples asked Jesus, as it’s recorded in Mark’s gospel, about the day and the hour of His return, what does He say? He said, “Of the day and the hour knows no man – not even the Son – but only the Father knows it.” Now in that response to His disciples Jesus Himself clearly put a limit to His own knowledge about the future. Now that has really, really puzzled the greatest minds of church history. Saint Thomas Aquinas, for example, who arguably was the most brilliant theologian of all time, stumbled all over the place over that question. Thomas scratched his head and said, “Jesus had to know the day and the hour! He was God incarnate! There was a perfect unity between the human nature and the divine nature, so how is it possible that Jesus didn’t know something?” So Aquinas developed what he called his “accommodation
-
theory,” where he said, “Jesus really did know, but the knowledge was too holy. It was too high; it was too wonderful. And so He didn’t want to go into a lengthy explanation as to why He couldn’t reveal the day and the hour at that point, but He cuts the Gordian knot, gives shorthand by accommodation, and just simply tells them He doesn’t know.” That’s a nice way out, except that what He said would be false. It would be a lie – maybe a little one, just a fib – but just enough to tarnish His perfection and make Him a lamb with a blemish and incapable of being our Savior. So I would prefer not to go into all these gymnastics to explain why Jesus said there was something He didn’t know and simply take our Lord at His word and believe that there was something He didn’t know.
-
Now obviously when Jesus says there’s something He doesn’t know, He’s speaking of His human nature. Now lest anybody think for a minute that the preacher this morning is a Nestorian, whatever that is (especially my Lutheran friends who are here), let me take a moment to explain this. In church history the church has fully embraced the dual nature of Christ, that He is vera homo, vera Deus – truly man and truly God – one person, two natures. And the reason for that formula was that we not obscure that at the same time we do have two distinct natures coexisting within this one person. And if we’re going to have a correct understanding of Jesus, we have to understand that the divine nature has all of the attributes of deity, and the human nature all of the limitations of humanity.
-
Now again, we distinguish the two natures, but we don’t separate them. Let me explain that. If I say that you, as a human being, are made up of a body and a soul, I can distinguish your two natures – your physical side, your non-physical side – without doing you any damage; but if I separate your body from your soul, I’ve just killed you. So there’s a big difference between a distinction and a separation. When Jesus is hungry, that’s a manifestation of His human nature, not of His divine nature. When He sweats, that’s a manifestation of His human nature, not of His divine nature; and likewise, when He says, “There’s something I don’t know,” that is a manifestation of His human nature, not His divine nature.
-
Then you say, “Well wait a minute, preacher – you never say that. You don’t call me “preacher” – but how’s come it is that throughout the Bible, and even in John’s gospel as we’ve been reading, we see Jesus manifesting supernatural knowledge all over the place?” Way back at the beginning of His public ministry when He sees Nathaniel, He tells Nathaniel everything about Nathaniel, and He’d never even met Nathaniel. He reads what is in people’s minds; He knows what they’re going to say before they say it, and He gives all these evidences of supernatural knowledge. Where does that come from? It comes from the communication of the divine nature to the human nature. Now there were things that Jesus didn’t know, but whatever He taught was impeccable because He never taught on the basis of His own human insight. So the Christian church has understood for centuries that touching His human nature, Jesus is not omniscient, but He is infallible because if He comes and He teaches something that isn’t true, then He’s held accountable.
-
Let me give an example of that. The biggest argument for the integrity of sacred Scripture is this argument: that the Bible is the Word of God quite simply because Jesus says it was. And the critics will say, “Well wait a minute! He wasn’t omniscient, so it’s okay if He made a mistake when He taught His disciples that the Bible was the Word of God and that Moses wrote of Him in the Pentateuch and all that. We can’t hold Him responsible for knowing things that He couldn’t possibly know. Oh yes we can because if a teacher walks into your classroom and says before class begins, “Let’s get a couple of things straight. First of all, I’m not going to say anything in here by my own authority because everything that I teach you comes from God Himself.” Now if I said that to you and then you found me making an error, what would you think about my claim of teaching only what God gives me? Not only that, suppose I came into this pulpit, and I said, “Ladies and gentlemen, this morning when you listen to me preach, I want you to be aware that what you will hear is the plain, unadulterated, unvarnished truth because I am the truth.” If you
-
didn’t call for the little guys with the white suits and the nets, then there’s something wrong with you because we are warned in Scripture that those who teach face a greater judgment, and that judgment is that those who teach are never to claim more knowledge than they actually have. Now in His human nature, Jesus does not have omniscience, but when Jesus declares that the Scriptures are the Word of God, if He’s wrong about that He has transgressed His own principles for teaching, and thereby would disqualify Himself as our Savior. And this is what’s going on here in this debate with the Jewish authorities. “Where’d you get your degree?” “I brought it with me from heaven. I don’t teach anything on my own, but my doctrine comes from the Father; and if you people really wanted the truth, and if you people really wanted knowledge, and if you people really cared about theology, you would believe every word that I tell you because the only words I give you are from Him. And if you wanted to do the will of God, you would hear my voice, and you would listen to me.”
-
You remember one of the times when God spoke audibly to the crowds about His Son: “This is my beloved Son. Hear Him.” God Himself attests to the authority of the teaching of Jesus, that His doctrine is true, and as He claims here there is no mixture of unrighteousness in it. And then Jesus turns the table on His enemies. You go around here, you question my credentials, and you hide behind the law of Moses. You keep telling me that you are disciples of Moses and that you’re students of the law. Well where did circumcision come from? It didn’t come from Moses; it came from the patriarchs before Moses. It came from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. So Moses didn’t invent circumcision.” Now why is He bringing this up? He says, “Because under the law of Moses, the law requires that every infant boy is to be circumcised exactly so many days after birth, right? Well what if the day of circumcision falls on the Sabbath? Does Moses require that you
-
postpone it? Oh, no. Not only does the law of Moses allow circumcision on the Sabbath day, the law of Moses requires circumcision on the Sabbath day. Now if the law of Moses requires that the sign of a person’s wellness be given on the Sabbath day, how can you object when I heal a man completely on the Sabbath day?” This is classic ad hominem argumentation, not in the abusive sense but in the logical sense where Jesus takes the foolishness of His critics to its logical conclusion and shows that He’s not the one that’s violating Moses, but that they are. And in so doing, exposes that despite their great knowledge and their academic credentials, they have remained fools and ignorant of the things of God.
-
The church is in tough times. We’ve seen the seminaries go into radical liberalism, denying the central tenants of the Christian faith. We’ve seen Christian colleges, one after another, deny Christianity altogether after a certain period of time. Why does that happen? I once read an essay by an Anglican scholar, and it was entitled fittingly, “The Treason of the Intellectual.” I mean many Christians, unfortunately, have fled from serious study of the things of God because they can’t trust their teachers anymore, because it’s the intellectual leadership of the body of Christ that has committed treason. Is there anything new about that? It was the intellectual community of Jesus’ day that was most antagonistic toward Him, because you see when perfect knowledge manifests itself, perfect truth comes in the door, that which is muddled, that which is blemished is exposed for what it is.
-
No wonder these men sought to kill Him, when Jesus said, “Moses gave you the law, yet none of you keeps the law. Why, then, do you seek to kill me?” And the people said, “You have a demon.” What does that mean? That’s – what they’re saying is, “You must be nuts! You must be out of your mind! This guy is demon possessed! Nobody’s trying to kill you.” Jesus said, “I did one work, and you all marveled. Moses, therefore gave you circumcision, but I made the man completely well. Don’t judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” And then in verse twenty-eight He said, “You know me. You know where I’m from. I have not come of myself, but He who sent me is true, whom you do not know. But I know Him, for I am from Him, and He sent me.” I said to Vesta last night, I said, “You know I don’t know about the long-term value of preaching every week from one book of the Bible because it takes so long to get through it, and maybe I should be jumping all over the place in John’s gospel to get this thing through.” But I said, “You know, I don’t want to do that because each tiny little passage that we look at in this gospel sheds more light to us and to our understanding of who He is, and I would hate for us to miss any of that.”
-
Now let me just finish by these last few statements that Jesus says. “I know Him. I am from Him, and He sent me.” Jesus said, “I know the Father. I know my stuff. You want to give me a doctoral examination in theology from the most rigorous test that Gamaliel has ever thought of? Give me the test. I know Him, and not only do I know Him, I don’t know Him from a distance, but I’m from Him. And I’m from Him, and the reason I’m here is because He sent me.” Do you hear the warning? “If you won’t hear the one whom God sends, who in the world will you hear?” That’s what Jesus is saying today. “You think you hear Moses, but your ears are deaf to Moses. You claim Abraham; you have nothing to do with Abraham. You think that you’re committed to God, but yet you reject the very one who comes from God and whom God sends into your midst.” When we hear Jesus speak, when we hear Jesus teach,
-
like Samuel in centuries past, our response should be, “Speak, Lord, for your servant hears.” Let’s pray. Father, how easily impressed we are with earthly honors, with earthly diplomas, and yet we won’t even respond to the truth when we hear it. Oh, Father, anything that we say that is true is not from ourselves, but we live on borrowed capital. There’s nothing true that we’ve ever learned that doesn’t come from somewhere else, and ultimately from you. And so teach us to have Jesus as our rabbi and as our master, for He alone has the words of eternal life. Amen.
Summary
Jesus confronts the religious leaders about their hypocrisy and their misunderstanding of His divine authority, citing His works and the Law of Moses. The sermon emphasizes that true understanding of doctrine comes from doing God's will and seeking His glory, not one's own. The practical takeaway is to judge righteously and acknowledge Jesus as the Christ, whose teachings are from God.